最も有効な JN0-691 試験参考書

Which CLI command would be used to verify the routing protocol daemon memory usage?

• A. show chassis routing-engine
• B. show route summary
• C. show route detail
• D. show system processes extensive

If an MX Series device rebootsto the secondary media, you must ensure that the device will continue to function as ifitis on the primary media.
Which two commands will accomplish this task? (Choose two.)

• A. user@host> request system software validate
• B. user@host# set system mirror-flash-on-disk
• C. user@host# set system dump-device boot-device
• D. user@host> request system snapshot

Which operational CLI command would you use to display information about the system and software processes?

• A. show system
• B. show chassis
• C. show cli
• D. show route

Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit --
[edit]
user@router# show interfaces
ge-1/1/2 {
vlan-tagging;
unit 100 {
vlan-id 100;
family inet {
address 192.168.0.1/30;
}
}
}
lo0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.10.10.1/32;
}
}
}
[edit]
user@router# show protocols ospf
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-1/1/2.0 {
interface-type p2p;
metric 250;
}
interface lo0.0;
}
[edit]
user@router# run show ospf interface
Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbrs
lo0.0 DR 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 0
[edit]
user@router#
-- Exhibit -
Referring to the exhibit, why does only the loopback interface appear in the show ospf interface output?

• A. The interface-type is not configured properly on the ge-1/1/2 interface.
• B. The metric configured on ge-1/1/2 is not valid.
• C. The incorrect logical unit for the ge-1/1/2 interface is configured under the OSPF hierarchy.
• D. The ge-1/1/2 interface is configured under the wrong OSPF area.

Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit -
May 20 22:27:04.010297 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343
area 0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:04.010320 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1
May 20 22:27:04.010342 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0
May 20 22:27:04.010365 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
May 20 22:27:04.010387 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
May 20 22:27:07.891698 OSPF periodic xmit from 192.168.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL
2684276180 area 0.0.0.0)
May 20 22:27:12.749988 OSPF packet ignored:area mismatch (0.0.0.1) from 192.168.0.2 on intf ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:12.750071 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343
area 0.0.0.0) May 20 22:27:12.750095 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.1 May 20 22:27:12.750116 checksum 0x166d, authtype 0 May 20 22:27:12.750139 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128 May 20 22:27:12.750161 dead_ivl 40, DR 192.168.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:14.393182 OSPF rcvd Hello 192.168.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/1/2.0 IFL 343
area 0.0.0.0) May 20 22:27:14.393262 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.10.10.1, area 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:14.393284 checksum 0x0, authtype 0 May 20 22:27:14.393307 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 50, opts 0x12, prio 128 May 20 22:27:14.393368 dead_ivl 200, DR 0.0.0.0, BDR 0.0.0.0 May 20 22:27:14.393399 OSPF packet ignored:our router ID received from 192.168.0.2 on
intf ge-1/1/2.0 area 0.0.0.0 -- Exhibit -
Referring to the exhibit, which two OSPF adjacency problems are present? (Choose two.)

• A. hello interval mismatch
• B. area number mismatch
• C. area type mismatch
• D. duplicate router ID