最も有効な C_DBADM_2601 試験参考書

CHALLENGE 3 - Cloud Planning Evidence Separation
The leadership update needs to cover current recovery readiness and future SAP HANA Cloud reporting migration. The on-premises readiness systems have backup and monitoring evidence, while the cloud database has provisioning and sample data only. Which action best supports accurate decision-making?

• A. Delay readiness sign-off until SAP HANA Cloud carries the same patient-flow workload.
• B. Separate current recovery readiness from SAP HANA Cloud migration readiness in the update.
• C. Treat cloud provisioning as proof that the migration stream is ready for reporting transition.
• D. Combine all evidence into one readiness status so the leadership update is easier to read.

A regional airport operator maintains SAP HANA for operational analytics while preparing an administration model that covers an on-premises database and an SAP HANA Cloud target. During a readiness review, SAP HANA cockpit confirms the on-premises database is available, while SAP HANA Cloud Central confirms that the cloud target is provisioned. However, the review evidence does not identify which environment owns backup monitoring, daily administration checks, or migration rehearsal validation.
The constraint is that the administrator must prevent unclear operational ownership before the next handover meeting. The team must keep both environments in scope without treating tool visibility as proof that administration responsibilities are correctly assigned.
Which action best addresses the ownership ambiguity?

• A. Use the on-premises database as the single administration reference until the migration project is fully completed.
• B. Remove the cloud target from the readiness review because it is not yet supporting the active workload.
• C. Approve the handover because both environments are visible in their respective SAP administration tools.
• D. Assign each administration activity to the correct SAP HANA environment and validate the evidence source for each responsibility.

A pharmaceutical packaging company is validating a planned software maintenance activity on its on-premises SAP HANA database while keeping dependent analytical work active in SAP HANA Cloud. After the maintenance sequence, the system is available, but one lifecycle validation record still shows the pre-maintenance level.
Basic operational checks succeed, so a junior administrator argues that the discrepancy can be ignored until the next window. The maintenance lead is concerned because future administration steps rely on a fully consistent lifecycle state. The team must resolve the issue now without triggering an unnecessary rollback of the entire maintenance cycle.
What is the best next action?

• A. Roll back the full maintenance activity immediately because any lifecycle mismatch means the current environment is invalid.
• B. Ignore the remaining lifecycle discrepancy because database availability proves that the maintenance sequence completed well enough for production use.
• C. Restart the database services again and assume the lifecycle record will realign automatically once all components refresh.
• D. Identify which maintenance finalization step did not complete correctly and finish that step before releasing the system.

A regional textile manufacturer is preparing an SAP HANA lifecycle update rehearsal for an on-premises database. The database is available, and the update package has been staged. During the final review, the administrator finds that the rollback checkpoint in the runbook still references the previous rehearsal's backup timestamp. The current backup completed successfully, but the rollback section was not updated before the approval meeting.
The constraint is that the rehearsal must begin only after rollback evidence matches the current lifecycle activity. The administrator must prevent execution from starting with a recovery reference that belongs to an earlier rehearsal.
What should the administrator do before approving the lifecycle update rehearsal?

• A. Keep the previous rollback timestamp because it was already proven during the earlier rehearsal.
• B. Restart SAP HANA so the runbook rollback section can be refreshed through the current runtime state.
• C. Start the rehearsal because the database is available and the current backup completed successfully.
• D. Update the rollback checkpoint to the current backup evidence, validate the reference, and proceed only after the runbook is current.

CHALLENGE 4 - Shipping-Cycle Recovery Evidence Gate
The business sponsor asks whether the release decision can proceed because the systems are available and backups completed. The administration lead wants startup behavior after recovery documented first. Which response best fits the scenario?

• A. Proceed now and validate startup behavior during the later cloud migration phase.
• B. Remove recovery evidence from the release package because cutover testing is not daily production.
• C. Proceed because availability and backup completion together are enough for release evidence.
• D. Complete recovery validation and startup behavior documentation before final approval.